Does anyone have any good Debate Team t-shirt slogans?

My school is starting up a Urban Debate League. I’d like to have t-shirts made for my team, but I am stumped as to what I should put on them. (I’m usually good at mobile local fusion this, I’m having a brain freeze). Thank you! You could impose the symbol of a circle with a slanted line through it (meaning “no”, “stop” or “don’t”) over the words – DICTO SIMPLICITER which is LED Grow the latin term for a SWEEPING GENERALIZATION. The message would be – DON’T OVER-GENERALIZE. The famous philosopher Renee Descarte said the famous line – “I think,therefore I am.” You could twist grow tents that and use one of the following: I DEBATE, THEREFORE I AM. I THINK, THEREFORE I AM, …I THINK. Picture of a fish rising out of the water with a worm and fishing line dangling out of it’s mouth and vortech supercharger the words – HOOKED ON DEBATE or HOOKED ON DE BAIT. Picture of a man with an icebag on his head and a thermometer in his mouth dress forms looking very ill preceded by NNNN and followed by the word TEAM. Taken all together the image represents FOUR N SICK TEAM (FORENSIC TEAM) You could print the word RESOLVED in large letters and underneath in a smaller font the words TO WIN. ************************************ You mannequins could use the latin phrase for the Descartes quote – COGITO, ERGO SUM or the twisted version – COGITO, ERGO SUM cb radios …I THINK. You could play with other’s minds and put some random word/words in large pring and in small print underneath in parenthesis the words THINK ABOUT IT: BANANAS (think about it) CLAM CHOWDER (think about it) AMONIMUM SULFATE (think about it) [Actually, this is a good one because amonium sulfate is a common stock trading courses fertilizer just like bullshi+ is.] ****************************** What part of ARGUMENTUM AD IGNORANTIAM don’t you understand? (Argumentum ad ignorantiam is the toenail fungus treatmentfallacy of assuming something is true simply because it hasn’t been proven false. For example, someone might argue that global warming is certainly occurring because nobody has demonstrated conclusively that it is not. But failing to prove the global warming theory false is not the same as proving it true.)